The Political Events and its
Historical Monuments
By
SHARMILA BOSE
M.A. POL. SCIENCE & HISTORY
Independent Researcher in Political Science
Abstract :
An attempted to explore through this
piece of research documents that whether History writing is authentic for its
students or it is just historical monuments of the Political event that
has either glorified the era or dishonor the perpetrator by manipulating the facts
and actual purpose.
The historical events such as First
World War, disintegration of Ottoman
Empire, World War II, creation of Israel, Holocaust, Division of India and creation of Pakistan, 9/11 Twin World Trade Center, Demolition of Babri Mazid, Gujarat
Riots, Assassinations of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, Sikh Riots, Forced displacement of Kashmiri Pandits
and Kashmir crisis are all the Political Events to which we need to explore
that how History present its monument to do the Justice to these events for its
student.
The Political events that were
strategically presented either by glorification or by condemning covering up
the actual agenda of that particular event so that the actual beneficiaries of
those events do not come on surface. This has made the Political history
as a monument of Historical Literature.
The theory of Conspiracy occurs only to
curtail radar of investigation of the political event that already have the
prescribed note written by the established western Scholars, which is nothing
but Intellectual Feudalism.
Introduction
History is the compilation
of Political events that are written and described by the Historians based on
the available resources and the evidence to justify the event. We treat those factual representations of the
facts as authentic and make further studies based on those written history.
We have known the War as the
historical events that have created International Relations and its perspective
policies. Warfare,
with its appalling humanitarian consequences and vast economic costs, has
stimulated financial innovations from the spread of coinage to the creation of
the national debt. Conversely, economic weakness and the inability to properly
utilize financial resources have been causes of military defeats. So the economy plays a crucial role towards
the War mongering and hence the politics and diplomacy becomes tool to design
the Wars and political unrest.[1]
This document
will explore the fact that what actually influenced the World Wars and who are the
beneficiaries that what has been represented in the history writing and
surfaced the partial and biased factual that have hidden the actual
perpetrators.
History books record that World War
I started with the nations went to war to avenge the assassination of the
Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Habsburg throne, on June 28, 1914
and it was Germany that initiated the War that led her to pay all the War
expenses after the Treaty of Versailles.
The War between Central Power and the Allied partners made the Historical
events changed the whole political establishment during that era and then
subsequent event that is still in the process.
The powers of Europe were divided
into two main divisions with Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy comprising one
camp and France and Russian making up the other. If Germany backed
Austria-Hungary against Serbia and the Russians backed Serbia, then Germany
would be forced to go to war against Russia and Russia’s ally, France.[2]
This is a misrepresented of the
Political Event termed as World War 1.
World War I was a designed war by the Royals in Europe and Zions to
capture the resources of the Ottoman Empire and disintegrate the region and
distribute the resources among themselves.
This is the untold history, which was never on record in the
academic. This war was not among the
Countries or Nations, it was War to control of resources, i.e. Oil and others
by the one Royal family affiliated to British Monarch and its Banker family the
Rothschild. The Politics in Europe was
nothing but the politics of the Royals in the extended family. Since these Royals were the head of the State
and controlling the economy on behalf of Rothschild so, they were the decision
maker for the fate of the population in that region.
World
Wars cannot be studied in isolation without understanding the domain of
Rothschild in the European Banking System and their intrusion in the finances
of Wars in the region and global sponsorship.
The Rothschilds love wars because they
are massive generators of risk free debt. This is because they are guaranteed
by the government of a country, and therefore the efforts of the population of
that country, and it doesn't matter if that country loses the war because the
loans are given on the guarantee that the victor will honour the debts of the
vanquished.[3] "1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his
famous statement, “I care not what puppet is placed
upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The
man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I
control the British money supply.”[4] This clearly indicates that the thrones in
the European countries were occupied by the puppet. So, blaming the Royals exclusive towards the
War design will be incorrect without exploring the designer and beneficiaries
of the Wars.
The
Power of Rothschild across the globe can be witnessed by the incident in
America. In 1811, The charter for
the Rothschilds Bank of the United States runs out and Congress votes against
its renewal. Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not amused and he states, "Either
the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States
will find itself involved in a most disastrous war." However the United
States stands firm and the Charter is not renewed, which causes Nathan Mayer
Rothschild to issue another threat, "Teach those impudent Americans a
lesson. Bring them back to colonial status." 1812: Backed by Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild's
orders, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds plan was
to cause the United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they
would have to surrender to the Rothschilds and allow the charter for the
Rothschild owned First Bank of the United States to be renewed. Mayer Amschel
Rothschild dies. In his will he lays out specific laws that the House of
Rothschild were to follow: all key positions in the family business were only
to be held by family members; only male members of the family were allowed to
participate in the family business, this included a reported sixth secret
bastard son (It is important to note that Mayer Amschel Rothschild also has
five daughters, so today the spread of the Rothschild Zionist dynasty without
the Rothschild name is far and wide, and Jews believe the mixed offspring of a
Jewish mother is solely Jewish); the family was to intermarry with it's first
and second cousins to preserve the family fortune (of the 18 marriages by Mayer
Amschel Rothschild's grandchildren, 16 were between first cousins - a practice
known today as inbreeding); no public inventory of his estate was to be
published; no legal action was to be taken with regard to the value of the
inheritance; the eldest son of the eldest son was to become the head of the
family (this condition could only be overturned when the majority of the family
agreed otherwise).[5] So, who are Zions? Zions are the extended family of Rothschild.
The Theory of Homeland for Jews
The idea of the homeland for the Jews already sprouted in 1896 by
the Zions. The draft of the objective of the modern Zionist movement submitted
to the First Zionist Congress of the Zionist Organization in 1897 read: "Zionism seeks to establish a home for
the Jewish people in
Palestine secured under public law."[6]
In 1914 With the
outbreak of World War I, Britain promised the independence of Arab lands under
Ottoman rule, including Palestine, in return for Arab support against Turkey
which had entered the war on the side of Germany. May 16, 1916: The British and French
Governments sign secret Sykes-Picot Agreement dividing Arab provinces of
Ottoman Empire into French and British administered areas. December 1917 British troops invade Palestine
capturing Jerusalem. Surrender of Ottoman forces in Jerusalem to Allied forces
under General Sir Edmund Allenby. 1919 The
Palestinians convened their first National Conference and expressed their
opposition to the Balfour Declaration. 1922 The Council of the
League of Nations issued a Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate was in favor of
the establishment for the Jewish people a homeland in Palestine. June 3:
The British government issues White Paper on Palestine excl. Transjordan from
scope of Balfour Declaration. June
30: US Congress endorses Balfour Declaration. July 24: League of
Nations Council approves Mandate for Palestine without consent of Palestinians.[7]
Homeland for Jews in Palestine would not have possible without
disintegration of Ottoman Empire. It was
not easy for Rothschild to disintegrate Ottoman Empire without the help of
British Royals.
"In May 1913 the royalty of Europe gathered
in Berlin for the wedding of the Kaiser's only daughter Princess Victoria
Louise. The extravagant event was the largest gathering of reigning monarchs in
Germany since unification, and the guests included Wilhelm's first cousin King
George V, now on the British throne, and Nicholas II of Russia, whose wife
Alexandra was another of Wilhelm's first cousins (her mother was Queen
Victoria's daughter Alice). It was not a
relaxed gathering. The paranoid Kaiser refused to leave George and Nicholas
alone together for fear of them plotting against him. It was also the last time
the crowned heads would assemble before the outbreak of war. The trigger for
the conflict was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the
Austro-Hungarian throne, by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo. The Kaiser encouraged
the Austrians to crush the Serbs in retaliation. This was bound to precipitate
war: if Russia crumbled before the takeover of its ally Serbia no one would
take it seriously again."[8]
In World War I, the German
Rothschilds loan money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loan money to
the British, and the French Rothschilds loan money to the French. Furthermore, the Rothschilds have control of
the three European news agencies, Wolff (est.
1849) in Germany, Reuters (est. 1851)
in England, and Havas (est. 1835) in
France. The Rothschilds use Wolff to manipulate the German people into a
fervour for war. From around this time, the Rothschilds are rarely reported in
the media, because they own the media. [9]
The Rothschilds wanted Palestine for
the following reason. They had great business interests in the Far East and
desired their own state in that area along with their own military which they
could use as an aggressor to any state that threatened those interests. The
British subsequently agree to the deal for Palestine and the Zionists in London
contact their counterparts in America and inform them of this fact.[10]
The Oil Factor in the World War
The main cause of World War I was the Germans’ wish to use the
Ottoman corridor in order to expand to the Middle East, which threatened the
British interests in the Middle East and India. The importance of oil can be
also seen from the fact that the English, the French and the Russians that had
centuries’ long disputes, managed to put these disputes aside, in order to form
an alliance against the rise of Germany.
It is of course no coincidence that just before the outbreak of the
First World War, oil engines had started replacing coal engines, dramatically
increasing the geopolitical importance of the oil rich regions. Note that both
England and Germany were very rich in coal but very poor in oil. In 1911 Winston Churchill, as the head of
the British Navy, ordered the replacement of the coal engines with oil engines,
something that would soon become the norm for all navies and armies, making the
20th Century the century of oil. The use of oil would ensure greater speed for
the British Naval ships. Moreover smoke would stop exposing their position.[11]
The
theory of Holocaust and the Anti-Semitic Laws
"The number of Jews who are soldiers for
different sides far exceeds any precedent to that point. Approximately a
million and a half Jews fought in World War I for their respective countries.
On the Allied side, at least 500,000 Jews served in the Russian Army, notwithstanding
widespread Russian anti-Semitism and distrust of Jews. After the United States
enters the war, U.S. forces get something like 250,000 Jewish soldiers. About
40,000 or so throughout the British Empire fought for Britain. And about 35,000
soldiers for France. On the side of the
Central Powers, nearly 100,000 Jews served in the German Army and 12,000 were
killed in action. German Jews were very determined to prove their loyalty to
Germany, to the Kaiser. The overall population of German Jews at the time was
probably around 500,000. So you had close to 20 percent of the total Jewish
population serving. In the Austro-Hungarian Army there were around 275,000 Jews."[12]
So, those who were killed in War were Jews because
their numbers in the Army were enormous.
Though there is no history written on the identity of those who were
non-Jews and were killed during the War.
This is very interesting to analyze that the World Wars were funded by
Rothschild and he dreamt for the legitimate homeland for Jews in Palestine,
which is the center point in the Middle East and very convenient to control the
region of the East and the West that has the ample reserves of oil. Further, these Wars were fought by Jews on
record. Hence, it should be perceived
that WWI and WW2 were fought for the homeland for Jews by the Jews and not by
the countries against the countries.
The theory of Holocaust that makes Jews victim
become illogical since the Jews were fighting the battle for their own
ambitious project of “Homeland” by destroying the biggest and the oldest
civilization of that era, i.e. Ottoman empire.
Further terminology of Holocaust / gas chamber is based Kabalistic mystic,
then how non-Jewish can play cruelty against Jews based on the cultural belief
Jews endorse. Further, if Holocaust was
the historical truth, then why no investigative body made any impartial
study? Holocaust is an imposed theology
to the Students of History.
Holocaust denial is explicitly or implicitly illegal in 16
countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel,
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
Slovakia, and Switzerland. Romania officially denied the Holocaust occurred on
its territory up until the Wiesel Commission in 2004. The European Union's
Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia states that denying or grossly
trivializing "crimes of genocide" should be made "punishable in
all EU Member States". Slovakia
criminalized denial of fascist crimes in general in late 2001; in May 2005, the
term "Holocaust" was explicitly adopted by the penal code and in
2009, it became illegal to deny any act regarded by an international criminal
court as genocide. In 2010 the Parliament of Hungary adopted legislation punishing
the denial of the genocides committed by National Socialist or Communist
systems, without mentioning the word "Holocaust". Such legislation
remains controversial. In October 2007, a tribunal declared Spain's Holocaust
denial law unconstitutional. In 2007 Italy rejected a denial law proposing a
prison sentence of up to four years. In 2006 the Netherlands rejected a draft
law proposing a maximum sentence of one year on denial of genocidal acts in
general, although specifically denying the Holocaust remains a criminal offense
there. The United Kingdom has twice rejected Holocaust denial laws. Denmark and
Sweden have also rejected such legislation.[13]
A number of deniers have been prosecuted under various countries'
denial laws. French literature professor Robert Faurisson, for example, was
convicted and punished under the Gayssot Act in 1990. Some historians oppose
such laws, among them Pierre Vidal-Naquet, an outspoken critic of Faurisson, on
the grounds that denial legislation imposes "historical truth as legal truth".
Other academics favor criminalization. Holocaust denial, they contend, is
"the worst form of racism and its most respectable version because it
pretends to be a research.[14]
A punishable Law against the denouncement of the
event that is recorded in the history is the evidence that History is scripted
and it is a theology imposed to its student that has no scope of variable.
The strategic move behind creation of Israel and
Pakistan
Pakistan is like
Israel, an ideological state. Take out the Judaism from Israel and it will fall
like a house of cards. Take Islam out of Pakistan and make it a secular state;
it would collapse. -- Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan's ruler, December 1981.[15]
Zionists held
that history has treated the Jews as a separate and distinct entity and nation.
Any realistic solution to the prolonged "Jewish problem" lies not in
looking for new rulers but for Jews to become rulers themselves. Similarly,
Jinnah held that Muslims are "a nation by any definition." The Muslim League argued that there were
historical as well as cultural differences between Hindus and Muslims that
neither the passage of time nor interaction could satisfactorily bridge.[16]
This argument
was surfaced to mobilize the aspiration of the leaders and people who wanted to
have their own identity and that motivated them to be the part of the
aggression designed by Rothschild and British Royal. Though Jews were not a small group in any
region, but a spread over across the globe and they were part of the population
wherever they survived then what was the justification of having a new
occupation based on identity? The same
things went for the Muslims leaders such as Jinnah who aspired for the piece of
land as Muslim country separating from India.
The formation of a Muslim political party on national level was seen as
essential by 1901. The first stage of its formation was the meeting held at
Lucknow in September 1906, with participation of representatives from all over
India.[17]
The idea of Pakistan was formulated
together with the idea of Israel. The
subsequent political events, i.e. creation of Political Party based on identity
was formed. The identity politics was
formulated before the WW1 to justify the creation of Israel and Pakistan which
are in the crucial relevance in the geopolitics of the region.
Politically
there was a degree of unity between Muslim and Hindu leaders after World War I,
as typified by the Khilafat Movement. Relationships cooled sharply after that campaign
ended in 1922. Communalism grew rapidly, forcing the two groups apart. Major
riots broke out in numerous cities, including 91 in U.P. alone. At the
leadership level, the proportion of Muslims among delegates to Congress fell
sharply, from 11% in 1921 to under 4% in 1923.[18] The end of World War I and the creation of
League of Nation that endorsed Balfour declaration for the homeland for Jews in
the Palestine, endorsed the Muslims in India a homeland for them by separating
themselves from India, the Hindus.
On 29 December 1930 Sir Muhammad Iqbal delivered his monumental
presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session. He said, I would like to see Punjab, North-West
Frontier Province, Sindh and Balochistan amalgamated into a single state.
Self-government within the British Empire or without the British Empire, the
formation of a consolidated North-West Indian Muslim state appears to me to be
the final destiny of the Muslims, at least of North-West India.[19] Why Muhammad Iqbal wanted self-government
with British Empire or without British Empire, because Pakistan is British
colony and Israel is Rothschild colony under the tag of identity.
The Muslim League supported the British war effort while the largest and most influential
political party existing in India at the time, the Indian National Congress, demanded
independence before it would help Britain.[20] Muslim League was the beneficiary of the
World War and Indian Congress was fight against the colonial legacy and
surrender to their strategy. This history
has not been presented on record.
On May 14, 1948, David
Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment
of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman
recognized the new nation on the same day.
Although the United States supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917,
which favored the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt had assured the
Arabs in 1945 that the United States would not intervene without consulting
both the Jews and the Arabs in that region. The British, who held a colonial
mandate for Palestine until May 1948, opposed both the creation of a Jewish
state and an Arab state in Palestine as well as unlimited immigration of Jewish
refugees to the region. Great Britain wanted to preserve good relations with
the Arabs to protect its vital political and economic interests in Palestine.[21]
Soon after President Truman took office, he
appointed several experts to study the Palestinian issue. In the summer of
1946, Truman established a special cabinet committee under the chairmanship of
Dr. Henry F. Grady, an Assistant Secretary of State, who entered into
negotiations with a parallel British committee to discuss the future of
Palestine. In May 1946, Truman announced his approval of a recommendation to
admit 100,000 displaced persons into Palestine and in October publicly declared
his support for the creation of a Jewish state. Throughout 1947, the United
Nations Special Commission on Palestine examined the Palestinian question and
recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. On
November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the
Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian
mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was
scheduled to end. Under the resolution, the area of religious significance
surrounding Jerusalem would remain a corpus separatum under international
control administered by the United Nations.
Despite growing conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews
and despite the Department of State’s endorsement of a trusteeship, Truman
ultimately decided to recognize the state Israel.[22]
So, what changed between 1945 and 1946 that
made a dramatic change in American and British policy on Palestine? It was Hiroshima-Nagasaki deadliest atomic
bombing. This event makes American bow
down to the Rothschild strategy. It
should also to be investigated what made US Army to bomb to the civilians when
the war was fought among the Army?? This
attack was just as similar to the Sikh Riots in Delhi which was meant to warn
the Sikh community and restrict them in Canada.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki deadliest attack was not from America, it was
sabotage against America. Rothschild
holds capacity to build a country and even destroy the country’s image due to
captivation of Media and Intellectual federation. It has capabilities to create Civil Wars,
social unrest and Recession of Economy through the strategies.
Further what is common between Israel and
Pakistan, it is their nuclear capabilities.
If the World do not endorse the strategy of Rothschild there will be
nuclear attack just like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Another interesting factor of Pakistan and
Israel is that their International Relations are complementary to the strategy
of British Royal and Rothschild, i.e. those who stand against Israel and in
good relations with Pakistan, e.g. Iran, North Korea, whereas those who are in
bad with Pakistan are in good relations with Israel, e.g. India.
9/11 and the War
on Terror
The
terrorism has been elaborated and decorated by two lobbies, i.e. the lobby of
Pakistan and the lobby of Israel. The
idea of terror was taken very seriously, when the Bush Administration took
Islamic intrusion as a war against America after the incident of 9/11. What is the hidden fact that none in the
mainstream academic discourse have risen?
Though many believe that it was an indigenous act, but was it
appropriately investigated?
The 1939 New York World’s Fair included
an exhibit called the World Trade Center that was dedicated to the concept of
“world peace through trade.”[23]
The first major test of the trade center’s structural integrity came on
February 26, 1993, when a bomb with the destructive power equal to 2,200 pounds
of TNT exploded in the parking garage of the second floor basement of the north
tower. The blast killed six people, injured more than 1,000 others and caused
an estimated $600 million in damage. Six Islamic extremists were tried and
convicted in connection with the plot.[24] In July 2001, just two months before the
terrorist attacks of September 11, the Port Authority agreed to lease the twin
towers to Larry Silverstein, a New York City developer. Silverstein agreed to
pay the equivalent of $3.2 billion over the next 99 years. At the time, over 99
percent of the 10.4 million square feet controlled by the Port Authority was
occupied.[25]
It was not on record that when the twin
attack was conducted, it was not World Trade Center, it was a leased building
given to a Developer Silverstein and he was to enhance construction for better
purpose. It can be presented as
abandoned building was attacked by terrorist.
Larry Silverstein signed the lease just six weeks before the WTC's twin
towers were brought to the ground by terrorists in the September 11, 2001,
attacks. The fact is why Terrorists would
destroy the building that had no relevance in the America’s or World
economy. It was the building to be
dismantled towards reconstruction.
Silverstein contended that the two jetliners crashing into the twin
towers about 15 minutes apart should be considered two separate events, which
would allow him to collect the maximum from the insurers for each tower, as
much as $7 billion. Silverstein has been
chosen to develop Freedom Tower, a 2 million-square-foot, 1,776-foot-tall skyscraper,
and plans as many as four other office buildings on the site. He is already
building a 52-story office tower where World Trade Center stood until it
collapsed in the wake of the attacks.
After leasing the complex, Silverstein negotiated with 24 insurance
companies for a maximum coverage of $3.55 billion per catastrophic occurrence.
However, the agreements had not been finalized before 9/11. The trial's central issue was whether a
document drafted by Silverstein's insurance broker in June 2001 was in effect
at the time of the attacks. That form
classified damages as a single occurrence if they were attributable to
"one cause or a series of similar causes."[26]
The twin attack that could be contracted was a typical case of the
financial fraud, to which the Financial institutions born the cost to benefit
an individual and the Bush Administration kept a closed eye towards that fraud
since they had a bigger goal to achieve, i.e. Oil reserves in the Middle East
and killing the opponent of Israel and destroy the leaderships in the region.
Peak Oil was the primary motive of the Bush regime for allowing and assisting the attacks. Without 9/11, it would have been impossible for the US
to invade Iraq and take over their oil fields, which gives the US a dominant
military position in the middle of the world's main oil production region as we
pass the point of Peak Oil.[27]
Terror and Anti-Terror
Theology
The ISI is also accused of supporting Taliban forces and recruiting and training mujahidin
to fight in Afghanistan and Kashmir. Based on
communication intercepts, US intelligence agencies concluded Pakistan's ISI was
behind the attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul on 7 July 2008, a charge that
the governments of India and Afghanistan had laid previously. The Pakistani
intelligence agency, the Inter-Services
Intelligence(ISI), is believed to be aiding these
organisations in eradicating perceived enemies or those opposed to their cause,
including India, Russia,
China, Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom and other members of NATO. Many nonpartisan sources believe that officials within Pakistan’s military and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)
sympathise with and aid Islamic terrorists, saying that the "ISI has provided covert but well-documented
support to terrorist groups active in Kashmir, including the al-Qaeda affiliate Jaish-e-Mohammed".[28]
Perhaps no nation on earth has had more experience in combating
terrorism than Israel. The Israeli
government has established extensive intelligence gathering and security
systems. The Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, maintains extensive files
on suspected terrorists and terrorist groups. It uses agents to infiltrate the
groups to gather information or spread disinformation. It also employs
controversial tactics including assassinating leaders and pre-emptive strikes on
terrorist groups.[29]
Pakistan is a terror breeder and Israel
is Intelligence to combat terror. Both
are controlled by British Royal and Rothschild.
Intelligence sharing is Israel main economy and control system of the
World, just the way Terror breeding is Pakistan pivotal economy. Intelligence
sharing requisite lies on the act of terrorism.
This is an extortion technique in the name of Security. Afghanistan is a victim of terrorism from
Pakistan is mainly because Afghanistan is the larger producer of the Opium in
the World and US presence in the Afghanistan in the name of War against
Terrorism is to protect the opium, which is the world 2nd largest
economy and world control system. The
source of intelligence of Israel against terror is that the designer of the
terror is their aid, so passing information in the name of intelligence sharing
is not a digging activity for Israel rather it is just a job of a courier boy.
The human resource
generation for the Terror outfit
organizations generate on identity and ideology. This is an intellectual domain that motivated
the locals / tribal of any region.
Identity politics is Jewish legacy
that sprouted prior to the World War1.
Two examples, such terror outfits that were responsible for the killing
of two Indian Prime Ministers, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were creations of
Khalistan and LTTE outfits. Both were
created in U.K. These two terror outfits
were two political events that had a common cause, i.e. these two Prime
Ministers were in support to Palestine and against the illegal occupation of
Israel. Both were supporters to the Yasser Arafat movement against
Israel. So, their elimination were
mandatory. It was similar to the killing
of Saddam Hussain, and Gaddafi. Killing
of Leader in the name of terrorism is to kill the opposition of Israel, which
is the land and population of Rothschild.
The human resources are provided by British Royal from her Commonwealth
regime.
Similar things go with Nepal Civil War to
which arms and ammunition were provided from Utter Pradesh. The demolition of Babri Masjid, 1992 and the
civil war aiding Maoists in Nepal in 1996 to 2006 has to add the support from
the Muslim community in UP to manufacture and smuggle to Nepal Border. Nepal being the Hindu country, communal
hatred became the ammunition to fuel this violence in the Hindu land. Why Babri Masjid was demolished in Congress regime
who are pro-Muslim? Why Ram Mandir could
not be constructed during NDA-I & II? It was mainly because Ram Mandir was
not the idea towards demolition of Babri Masjid. The manufacturing of small weapons in UP
households is the cause of criminalization of UP since in the past 15 years, a
quantum of population was engaged in the economy of violence.
Displacement
of Kashmiri Pandit and Kashmir crisis
There is a connection between Ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus
and demolition of Babri Mazid. In 1986, Ghulam
Mohammad Shah snatched the power from his brother-in-law Farooq Abdullah and
became the chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir. Shah decided to construct a
large mosque, Shah Masjid which was named after him within the premises of an
ancient Hindu temple inside the New Civil Secretariat area in Jammu. Many
people of Jammu took to streets to protest with large demonstrations and
marches against this decision. [30] This instigated hindu sentimental and idea of
division of Kashmir. The displacement of
Kashmiri Pandits was towards that agenda.
The displacement of Kashmiri Pandits did not bring peace in the
Valley. The terror insurgency was a part
of the Rothschild agenda and the atrocities of Army against the civilian to
make them anti-India so that they could reach to a conclusion of division of
Kashmir. This will be based on that one
part that will be retained by Pakistan will be used as a transit route for
BRICS. The Kashmir crisis is a designed
by Rothschild and it is nothing naturally grown or distress.
Gujarat Riots and SEZ policy
Gujarat Riots should be viewed under the
background of Kargil War and Parliament attack.
Kargil War was to make Indian government to surrender its economy to
Special Economic Zone, which was beyond the ambit of National Laws, Taxation
and Accountability. Parliament Attack
was to make the Parliamentarians to surrender their consent on SEZ. Gujarat Riots were to make the people not to
oppose the implementation of SEZ. SEZ is
a foreign land within the National boundaries.
The Adani Group was established in
1988 but its real rise happened under Modi’s reign in Gujarat. From 2002 to last March the group’s revenue
rose from $765 million to $8.8 billion while net profits climbed even
faster. Adani has, over the years,
leased 7,350 hectares-much of which he got from 2005 onward-from the government
in an area called Mundra in the Gulf of Kutch in Gujarat. Adani got 30-year, renewable leases on the
land for as little as one U.S. cent a square meter (the rate maxed out at 45
cents a square meter). He in turn has
sublet this land to other companies, including state-owned Indian Oil Co., for
as much as $11 a square meter.
Modi gives away land for Rs 1 per square metre to Adani.[31]
Residents of Navinal Village,
including the head Jadeja, filed in 2011 a petition in the Gujarat High Court
after they lost their grazing land to the SEZ. In January, the court declared the SEZ illegal and ordered the companies
that had set up factories in there to stop all work. The Supreme Court,
India’s highest, has refused to stay the lower court’s decision. With hundreds
of millions of dollars already invested-albeit in a project now in legal
limbo-the question now is if Adani’s effort has become too big to shut down. The Gujarat High Court passed the ball on
that decision to the central government, asking if the project could be granted
a belated environmental clearance.[32]
Conclusion
Identity is
always a tool of Rothschild Think Tank.
Any violence that has the face of identity is their design just the way
Holocaust was Rothschild propaganda. There
are many scope for further research, i.e. who are Jews? How Israel of
Rothschild is controlling the World?
What is the realism of Security Pact?
Why there is a huge defense budget across the globe in the era of
Peace? These questions have strategic
answers which could be another topic for research.
In the
concluding note, it is prescribed that historical monument should be based on
the historical events and not as a memorizer that becomes a historical
literature. The history that is
presented in academics is far away from the realism of the political
events. The dynasty of Rothschild are
well organised con-artist and property
mafia, they have misrepresented the world though intellectual
colonization. Unless we know the correct
history, it will never be possible to make the present correct. History is written either in the capitalist
viewpoint or the Marxist approach, but historian never took the approach of
Political Criminology to evaluate History.
Thus history has become a human literature and not human science. History should come under the ambit of
Political Science and not Political Literature.
[1] Davies, Glyn. A history of
money from ancient times to the present day, 3rd ed.
Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2002. 720 pages. Paperback:
ISBN 0 7083 1717 0. Hardback: ISBN 0 7083 1773 http://projects.exeter.ac.uk/RDavies/arian/war
[2] ibid
[3] http://www.rense.com/general88/hist.htm
[4] ibid
[5] ibid
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeland_for_the_Jewish_people
[7] History of Palestine – Chronology, Palestine
American Council. http://www.pac-usa.org/chronology.htm
[9] http://www.rense.com/general88/hist.htm
[10] ibid
[11] https://iakal.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/the-first-world-war-for-oil-1914-1918-similarities-with-the-2014-oil-wars-100-years-later/
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial
[14] ibid
[15] http://www.meforum.org/348/the-strangely-parallel-careers-of-israel
[16] ibid
[17] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-India_Muslim_League
[18] ibid
[19] ibid
[20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_in_World_War_II
[21] https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel
[22] ibid
[23] http://www.history.com/topics/world-trade-center
[24] ibid
[25] ibid
[26] http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/29/attacks.insurance/index.html?eref=sitesearch
[27] http://www.oilempire.us/peakoil.html
[28] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
[29] http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/terrorism-how-have-other-countries-handled-it.html
[30] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing_of_Kashmiri_Hindus
[31] Pratik
Sinha - March 16, 2014.
http://www.truthofgujarat.com/modi-adani-affair-revealed/
NOTE : This article was published in The
Political Events and its Historical Monuments,
Volume 1. September, 2016, Amity Global History Review, Research Journal of
Amity Institute of Social Science, NOIDA
