Friday, June 21, 2013

Rape - an Invasion (Under Dependency Theory)



Rape – An Invasion
(Under Dependency Theory)


Rape is an invasion in the regime of Women’s sovereignty, i.e. as an individual and as a community.  Though, there are strong laws that provide preferential status to women, but still such laws failed to restrict violence against women whether domestic or workplaces or on streets even though women are so vocal and active towards their rights and privileges.  These stringent laws instead of curtailing crimes against women has proliferated more social crisis such as Broken marriage, Gender Disparity, Gender Conflict, Proliferation of Gay fabric, Hate crimes, sexual abuse at Workplace, etc.

The definition of Rape within the legal perspective is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse, which is initiated by one or more person against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority or with a person who is incapable of valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, or below the legal age of consent.[1]

This definition is certainly invasion on the Women’s sexuality, but the term rape is more than sexual invasion, it is rather an invasion to her sovereignty.  This Sovereignty embeds her with self, family, society and nation that provide her identity as individuality and to a gender of the society.   The regime of her feminism that gives her the identity of women to be wife and mother besides her individualism cannot be limited to the rape on sexuality.

Sexual violence is one factor of Rape against women.  This is towards as individual and as a Community.  Though there has been huge activism in the field of Women’s Right towards freedom of choice and towards her Right to her body and also towards her Economic independence and Political participation.  There have been substantial preferential Laws are made blanket protection in domestic arena and also at workplace, but none of these preferential laws could protect women from the violence of sexual, physical, economic and political.

Prior to evaluate the Laws to combat Rapes in the society, it is important to define the term “Rape” within the spectrum of Political Science.  Rape is an invasion to a Sovereign of the Regime either through violence, force or manipulation against the consent towards plundering of the Regime.

A nation is a macro regime and women are micro regime (Macro-Micro Theory).  Rape is an invasion to the micro regime, i.e. women to plunder her sovereignty, i.e. her body through force, violence and manipulation to exploit her body or to intrude her sovereign either to satisfy the instinct or to destroy the morality or revenge.  The tremendous rise in Rape graph is to oppress and terrorize the community of women.

Historically, women were raped randomly as War-crime or intrusion or oppression any community during riots.  These political rapes were mainly done to demoralize the community or the nation.  In becomes a challenge to the manhood of the community by destroying their women sovereignty. 

In the era of Globalisation, it is important to study the condition of women at Global level where the world is divided into three sections of Core, Periphery and Semi-periphery nations based on Dependency theory as Global Economic Policy.  It is also important to understand how the Global Economic Policy has influenced the condition of Women irrespective of the region in the World. Rape signifies when you seize the right to dignified life through violence whether it is sexual, financial, terror or threat to life.

Rape and Cruelty against women

Three pattern of cruelty against women, i.e. domestic violence, street violence and violence at workplace.

Domestic Violence is not limited to Gender orientation; it is always a victimization of the dependency.  These dependencies could be women, children or old parents and even men in the family.  Hence, the domestic violence should be studied within the perspective of Family than gender.  Generally, women are the victim of domestic violence due to their dependency on the family and their physiology.  These women could be daughter, wife and mother.

The three factors that influence the oppression / violence in the family are instincts to oppress, economy either due to scarcity or greed and environment of coercion due to political instability or governance inadequacies.

Instinct to oppress is a natural factor and can be a patriarchy in nature, i.e. Powerful against Weak.  Women being weak in the physiology become the victim of oppression.  The abuse of children become a psychological factor or tool to oppress women to surrender to the instinct of oppression and also make children as victim within the ambit of domestic violence.  Similarly, the old parents irrespective of gender that are liabilities of the family become the victim of instinct of escapism from the responsibilities and hence violence whether verbal, physical and environmental becomes a tool to repress them.  Hence, it is not the gender that is abused in the arena of domestic ambit, but it is the instinct of oppression that makes women as victim.

Another factor is economy, i.e. the factor of scarcity and/or greed.  Economy of the family paves a vital factor towards the oppression or violence in the domestic ambit.  Inadequate money, toxic habits, illicit relations and greed force to exploit women at home.  Inadequate money leads to frustration and domestic area becomes a burden for the bread-earner and violence becomes the tool to drain the frustration or escapism from the responsibilities.  Greed becomes main cause of the domestic violence, whether it is for dowry harassment or the lust of women for illogical demands or beyond the ambit of economic capabilities of the bread earner.

The third factor is environment that influences the causes of all miseries of women.  The first and foremost reason is political instability that creates economic crisis that leads to instability of the resource generation at the micro regime.  When there is a recession in economy, the effect is bound to influence women at home.  This pave ways for all the illicit activities such as prostitution within marriage, keep culture and push towards the sex-trade.  These activities are forced than volunteer.  When they are forced, violence becomes tool.

The second most causes of miseries as the condition of women are due to Human Trafficking, which is an Institutional Crime due to Global Political Economy under the Dependency Theory of Core, Semi Periphery and Periphery relations.  Human trafficking whether for internal migration or global illicit migration makes women and children Forced Labour for sexual slavery or hazardous industrial labour.    To compel women and children in the domestic arena towards trafficking for forced labour, manipulation or violence is used that make women and children either run away or being caught in the nexus of traffickers.

Street Crimes which are beyond the domestic arena, i.e. in the family system, are treated as Street crimes.  These crimes are due to shattered social fabric and unaccountability due to toxicities, hatred and restlessness due to reasons of governance inadequacies of State and Society.

Street Crimes against women can be segmented into three aspects, i.e. acid throw, violence in-street and sexual abuse at workplace.  Acid throw is the most heinous crime at par with terrorism in any land.  It destroys the civility and creates an environment of fear and insecurity.  The same situation is felt by women who become target due to conflict or hate.  Acid throw is a hate crime.  The most pathetic of this aspect that the victim not only destroy the normal life, but face the social alienation and also goes through the trauma besides the physical, mental and financial pain.  These women are simply orphan in the State-system because the victim of crime neither gets justice due to inadequacies in Criminal Justice System and not the ownership by the State towards rehabilitation and treatment.

Another factor of Crime against Women is Drugs and Alcohol due to shattered society.  A society without the social administration led to social behavior beyond accountability.  Freedom without norms leads to directionless society and this is further fueled by toxic of drugs and alcohol which make women a victim due to their physiology.  The ungoverned instinct leads to youth into crime nexus that facilitate their life-style at the cost of others’ liberty.

The alcohol-drug abuse-violence nexus presents itself in several distinctly different facets: alcohol and other drugs of abuse may act on brain mechanisms that cause a high-risk individual to engage in aggressive and violent behavior. Individuals with costly heroin or cocaine habits may commit violent crimes in order to secure the resources for further drug purchases. Narcotic drug dealers, but not alcohol vendors, practice their trade in a violent manner. Alcohol, narcotics, hallucinogens, and psychomotor stimulants differ substantially from each other and in the way that they are related to different kinds of violent and aggressive behavior.[2] The violence against women, which is also termed as Regime is prone to victimizing on the street crimes due to physiology.  Migration community which has an easy escape from the crime scene is also responsible for the rise of crime against women.
The third aspect of street crime is abuse at workplace.  Women are abused at workplace is mainly to facilitate the business promotion where corruption has become a business culture than expertise and excellence.  Women are used towards facilitation to clients and other associates.  Another factor is the culture of alternate women due to abuse of power and work ethics.  A compulsive approach towards career makes few to compromise and accept sexual abuse as work culture.  But such compromised work culture might generate business, but against the human resources crisis since compromised work culture pollute the professional environment and ultimately harm organization in a longer run.
Institutional Crime is mainly related to human trafficking, which is an Organised Crime that facilitates Global Economic Policy based on dependency theory.  Brain drain through licit migration and forced labour through illicit migration is a key tool towards abuse of humanity who are not only become a victim of forced labour, but also loose their organs in the wake of organ smuggling.  This institutional crime is deliberately done by the Policies of the Government that refuses to own their population and leave them in the hand of traffickers who abuse men, women and children by threat and violence to fetch their requisites towards periphery crimes, smuggling, trafficking and arms conflicts.

Globalisation and Condition of Women

Though Globalisation has made the World a global village, but the fact is Globalisation has made women more destitute in tune of illegal migration towards forced labour and sex trade.

The key findings by UNODC, Global Report on Trafficking in Person, 2012 indicates how the women are maximum victims of human trafficking amongst other groups of men and children in the era of Globalisation..

Ø                  Between 2007 and 2010, almost half of victims detected worldwide were trafficked across orders within their region of origin. Some 24 per cent were trafficked inter-regionally (i.e. to a different region).

Ø                  Domestic trafficking accounts for 27 per cent of all detected cases of trafficking in persons worldwide.


Ø                  The Middle East is the region reporting the greatest proportion of victims trafficked from other regions (70 per cent). Victims from the largest number of origin countries were detected in Western and Central Europe.

Ø                  The trafficking flow originating in East Asia remains the most prominent transnational flow globally. East Asian victims were detected in large numbers in many countries worldwide.

Ø                  Victims from Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South America were detected in a wide range of countries within and outside their region of origin, although in comparatively lower numbers outside their region of origin.

Ø                  Almost all human trafficking flows originating in Africa are either intraregional (with Africa and the Middle East as their destination) or directed towards Western Europe.

Ø                  One hundred and thirty-four countries and territories worldwide have criminalized trafficking by means of a specific offence in line with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol.

Ø                  The number of convictions for trafficking in persons is in general very low. Notably, of the 132 countries covered, 16 per cent did not record a single conviction between 2007 and 2010.

Ø                  Women account for 55-60 per cent of all trafficking victims detected globally; women and girls together account for about 75 per cent.

Ø                  Twenty-seven per cent of all victims detected globally are children. Of every three child victims, two are girls and one is a boy.

Ø                  In general, traffickers tend to be adult males and nationals of the country in which they operate, but more women and foreign nationals are involved in trafficking in persons than in most other crimes.

Ø                  Women traffickers are often involved in the trafficking of girls and tend to be used for low-ranking activities that have a higher risk of detection.

Ø                  Trafficking for sexual exploitation is more common in Europe, Central Asia and the Americas. Trafficking for forced labour is more frequently detected in Africa and the Middle East, as well as in South and East Asia and the Pacific.

Ø                  Trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation accounts for 58 per cent of all trafficking cases detected globally, while trafficking for forced labour accounts for 36 per cent. The share of detected cases of trafficking for forced labour has doubled over the past four years.

Ø                  Victims trafficked for begging account for about 1.5 per cent of the victims detected globally. Trafficking for the removal of organs has been detected in 16 countries in all regions of the world.

Ø                  Victims of 136 different nationalities were detected in 118 countries worldwide between 2007 and 2010.

Ø                  Approximately 460 different trafficking flows were identified between 2007 and 2010.

The key findings indicate two major points, i.e. the land of origin and the land of destination.  The land of destination is called Core nations and the land of origin is treated as Periphery nation.  The pattern of Violence against women differs from Core nations and Periphery nations due to the flow of human trafficking and the pattern of Economy, since it is a relation between buyer and seller.  Another key factor in the core and periphery nations is the role of semi-periphery nations.  Semi-periphery is the transit nations to the supply chain.  This supply chain is seen within Region, Intra-Region and Global.

Pattern of Violence against Women vary from Core Nations to Periphery Nations.   Core nations are victims of Street Crimes where as Periphery nations are mostly victims of Domestic Violence.  The reason behind the change of pattern of violence is Migration.  For example in the following study on rape in America[3] states.

“Our findings indicate that about 20 million out of 112 million women (18.0%) in the U.S. have ever been raped during their lifetime. This includes an estimated 18 million women who have been forcibly raped, nearly 3 million women who have experienced drug-facilitated rape, and 3 million women who have experienced incapacitated rape1. During the past year alone, over 1 million women in the U.S. have been raped: over 800,000 who have been forcibly raped, nearly 200,000 who have experienced drug-facilitated rape, and about 300,000 who have experienced incapacitated rape. Although this study offers limited insight into changes in the prevalence of rape over time, our estimates do not appear to support the widely held belief that rape has significantly declined in recent decades.

One of the more striking findings of this study was that only 16% of all rapes were reported to law enforcement. Notably, victims of drug-facilitated or incapacitated rape were somewhat less likely to report to the authorities than victims of forcible rape. Major barriers to reporting rape to law enforcement included: not wanting others to know about the rape, fear of retaliation, and perception of insufficient evidence, uncertainty about how to report, and uncertainty about whether a crime was committed or whether harm was intended. Injury was reported for 52% of forcible rape incidents and 30% of drug-facilitated or incapacitated rape incidents assessed. Medical care was received following 19% of forcible rape incidents and 21% of drug-facilitated or incapacitated rape incidents. Perpetrators were known to the victim in a high percentage of forcible rape, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape incidents.”

Whereas, the pattern of violence in the developing nations, i.e. periphery nations as shown in the following study by WHO[4]

“Population-level surveys based on reports from victims provide the most accurate estimates of the prevalence of intimate partner violence and sexual violence in non-conflict settings. The WHO Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women in 10 mainly developing countries found that, among women aged 15-49:
  • between 15% of women in Japan and 71% of women in Ethiopia reported physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime;
  • between 0.3–11.5% of women reported experiencing sexual violence by a non-partner since the age of 15 years;
  • the first sexual experience for many women was reported as forced – 17% in rural Tanzania, 24% in rural Peru, and 30% in rural Bangladesh.
Intimate partner and sexual violence are mostly perpetrated by men against girls and women. Child sexual abuse affects boys and girls. International studies reveal that approximately 20% of women and 5–10% of men report being victims of sexual violence as children.
Risk factors for both intimate partner and sexual violence include:
  • lower levels of education (perpetration of sexual violence and experience of sexual violence);
  • exposure to child maltreatment (perpetration and experience);
  • witnessing family violence (perpetration and experience );
  • antisocial personality disorder (perpetration);
  • harmful use of alcohol (perpetration and experience);
  • having multiple partners or suspected by their partners of infidelity (perpetration); and
  • attitudes that are accepting of violence and gender inequality (perpetration and experience).”
If a comparative study is done on both Core and Periphery regions, the cause of violence against women varies.  The women become victim in the hand of toxic of drugs in the core nations, whereas, in periphery nations it is mainly due to poverty and under-development.
Migrations to the core nations whether licit or illicit have created huge social disorder in the Core Nations, which starts from broken families and shattered society.  Absence of social administration system and broken families, there is a huge lapse on virtue development process resulting to constant inflow of migrating communities.  These migration communities in the absence of family system become a big market for Sex Trade. 
The important factor of the social chaos in the Core nation is Gender disparity.  The individualism rules the society which leads to the lapses of tolerance and acceptability of the partner.  Further a huge rise of living standard makes economy determine relationship and hence a throw away tendencies that leads to the broken relationships.  Broken relationship leads to step-relations which always destroy the peace which leads to tendencies of escapism and take the shelter of drugs and toxic.  The submission to toxic further leads to crimes and immoral activities.
The pattern of Economy plays a decisive role in the condition of population in any region. Core nations, advanced in technologies and Corporatism in Economy have made the State-system feudal in nature.  The feudalistic approach always creates a fabric of serf and control of resources.  The illicit economy becomes parallel to licit economy that serves the interest of the Corporate.  Absence of State-control over economy in the wake of liberalization and shrinking of Welfare State, a huge population in the absence of skills become human resources of illicit activities.  Illicit activities destroy the morality and ultimately it is women who suffer due to its physiology in the wake of absence of social system.

Similarly, the condition of the periphery nations is also influenced by its economic and its demographic pattern.  Most of the periphery nations are rich in natural resources and a wide tribal population and also extend the legacy of colonial history.  Periphery nations being rich in natural resources and bio-diversity, remain the attraction for the Core nations to facilitate their Industrial aspiration and captivation of resources and market.  The backwardness in the periphery nations that led to poverty in the region is due to non-compatibility with the modern economy.  The acute ignorance and insensitivity of the Political system under the wake of Democratic process made these populations just as receiving end and absolutely neglected.  Absence of appropriate economy for the tribal and rural population made them victim of human trafficking that facilitate the economy of the Core nations towards forced labour and sexual slavery.  Children are trafficked and abducted for all the periphery economy where adults refuse to work due to its hazardous condition.  Violence is a tool to control these neglected population.

Institutionalized violence is mainly seen in the semi-periphery nations which are also called transit nations.  The economy of the transit nations mainly depend on the facilitation the need of the core nations and training the population of the peripheries accordingly.  The industrial development of the semi-periphery nations limit to the status of vendors to cater the industrial need of the core nations.  But the conditions of women do not get better in these transit nations.  The mix patterns of violence against women are visible, i.e. from the domestic violence to street violence along with institutional violence.

Interestingly, Global Economic Policy destroyed the indigenous economy of the entire region whether it is Core, Periphery or Semi-periphery nations.  A larger portion of the population is directionless due to Corporatism of Economy and Corruption in Political system under Democratic process which has led to a complete directionless society. Hence, the global economic policies have greater impact on the condition of women since it is women who are the nurturer of the society and in the absence of provision; every equation in the social development gets stalled.

Empowering Women through Preferential Laws

India has overhauled its rape laws to introduce new crimes, expand the definition of rape, and toughen up punishments for the perpetrators of sexual violence — instituting long awaited changes brought to the public eye by a series of brutal, highly public gang rapes.[5]
There is a huge concerns raised on the issue of rape as a cruelty against women.  Here the amended Law on Rape to expand its spectrum to punish harsh to the offenders. Anti-rape Bill which provides for life term and even death sentence for rape convicts besides stringent punishment for offences like acid attacks, stalking and voyeurism.[6]

The new law is a combination of just thinking about gender and existing patriarchal attitudes in society, as well as those ingrained in the colonial Indian Penal Code of 1860.  So "outraging the modesty of a woman" remains a legitimate legal standard, though some new crimes based on a women's right to bodily integrity and to be free of sexual harassment have also been incorporated.[7]

But this new Law failed to visualize the cause of rapes and became a preferential law to protect the modesty of a woman.  Earlier, while brides were burning due to dowry also brought stringent laws that protected women by way of Dowry Prohibition Act[8], but this law still could not prevent bride killing for the lust and greed by in-laws.  Section 498A[9] brought a guaranteed protection of women in marriage, but still this law neither protects women in marriage nor able to prevent broken marriage.  This has further created Gender Disparity.

The criminal law as contained in the IPC and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act 1986 perceive prostitution as a necessary evil which should be contained but not be completely prohibited. The laws do criminalise the outward manifestations like soliciting, brothel-keeping, trafficking in women for prostitution, but do not ban prostitution per se. Formulated in this manner, women in prostitution are exposed to harassment by the police and exploitation by pimps and customers. The law still has not responded to women's demands for recognising that women in prostitution have made the best economic choice possible in the circumstances and that prostitution should be decriminalised to protect their legal rights.30 It continues to view prostitution as a necessary social evil nurtured by immorality and illicit relationships.[10]

Sections 372 and 373 of the IPC declare as offences the selling or buying of minor/s for the purpose of prostitution. These sections apply to males and females below the age of eighteen years but provide extra protection to women.  Explanations to these sections lay down the presumption that possession of a female by a prostitute or a brothel-keeper is for the purpose of prostitution.  These sections also apply if the minor is sold or purchased with the intent that such minor, at any age, shall be employed or used for illicit intercourse or for any unlawful and immoral purpose. For the purposes of these sections illicit intercourse is limited to heterosexual intercourse between two persons not united by marriage.[11]

The devadasi system was outlawed in all of India in 1988, yet some devadasis still practice illegally.[12] The practice of devdasi system termed illegal, but there is a constant advocacy of legalizing prostitution.  The institutionalized of prostitution through Human Trafficking to the regional, intra-regional and global level is being practices shows the legislation to curb the crimes is beyond the understanding of the Social system. 

Similarly, Article 24 of India's constitution prohibits child labour. Additionally, various laws and the Indian Penal Code, such as the Juvenile Justice (care and protection) of Children Act-2000, and the Child Labour (Prohibition and Abolition) Act-1986 provide a basis in law to identify, prosecute and stop child labour in India.[13] Still this law could not protect children from the abuses of forced labour of hazardous industry and child prostitution.  The blooming crime of children’s abduction and trafficking is an indicator that laws are meant to decorative legislation and not part of the governance system.  Any law, which is beyond the ambit of social system is a “Dictatorship of Law” which gets bounced by the society and creates a lot of social chaos since law without the endorsement from the society cannot deliver for good and it cannot be done through pressure group.  Similar things happened with Preferential Laws for Women.  It has a dictatorship of Law against Men and hence it has bounced back and further created gender disparity.

Touch Theory and Human relations

Touching is an integral part of human behaviour; from the moment of birth until they die, people need to be touched and to touch others. Touching is an intimate action that implies an invasion of the individual's personal, private space.[14]  Touch is an important aspect of life and to touch soft is a relation bonding of men and women.  Women are soft, so it compels men to touch her, whereas children as soft that make women to pamper her.  This is a chain of touch that paves way to the family system.  The broken marriage and gender disparity has given a scarcity to the aspiration of touch and that is why women are targeted through coercion to satisfy the basic instinct to touch soft. 

Sudden growth in the homosexuality tendencies is mainly due to the disparity of family system that satisfies the aspiration of touch.  Buying sex is expensive and hence the tendency to manipulate towards the same sex or the coercive sex has gone up  drastically.

In a survey answered by hundreds of rape and sexual assault support agencies, they estimated that 93.7 percent of male rape perpetrators are male and 6.3 percent were female. (Greenberg, Bruess and Haffner, 575)  Many people do not believe that male rape by a female exists. However, penile erection can be achieved under emotional duress such as anger, fear, and pain even if the male does not wish it. (Greenberg, Bruess and Haffner, 576; Lips, 234)

Lesbians report “physically or mentally coercive sex” more often than do gay men. One study found that thirty-one percent of lesbians reported forced sexual encounters versus twelve percent of gay men. (Scholars have presumed that lesbians and gay men disagree on what is considered “aggressive.” Often, lesbian reports contain statements of how they were emotionally abused as well as physically abused. Moreover, lesbians are often times more “sensitized” to “sexual coercion” and can more easily identify it, while gay men more often consider “coercion as fair play.”) (Schwartz and Rutter, 67)

This is an indicator that Rape is not a Gender issue, but a tendency to invade and oppress and scarcity to fulfill the biological need.  It is important to evaluate these instincts to oppress and provide an appropriate mechanism to curb the instinct of oppression through social administration and accountability.  Laws are tools of Governance system, but not the governance system in itself.  Hence, while making legislation it is important to understand the social system inclusive to all, without which legislation will lose its implementation values and create a resistance towards Law.  Rape is a serious issue and should not be limited to sexual coercion and women’s appeasement through preferential laws that will create gender disparity.

Conclusion

Violence against women is a universal phenomenon irrespective of the pattern of development, i.e. Developed, developing or under-developed nations.  Only the pattern of crime differs due to economy’s influence in the Social system.

Economic independence has not provided women a secured life.  It is only helped her towards purchasing power and self-decisive.  But physical security cannot be purchased.  It is a social system that is protected by the State-system. It is not possible to protect women by oppressing men because it is men who protect women from men in the society. 

Women are nation-builder.  She creates next generation and nurtures them towards the continuity of the human race.  She is a catalyst that binds three generations, i.e. parents, self and children.  If she is destroyed, whole society will be shattered and hence leads to absence of virtues.  Absence of virtues leads to economy collapse and further fall in Political system.

Violence against women is a serious issue since it makes her insecure and she is not able to focuses on her duty to which she is born with, i.e. continuity of the human race and society- building and bring civility in the society.  Women are not alien from men.  It is men and women that make humanity.



Reference:


“Female Asian Migrants : A Growing But Vulnerable Workforce.” 1996. World of Work,
(15):pp.16-17

Foundation of Women’s Forum. 1988, Trafficking in Women for the Purpose of Sexual
Exploitation, Stockholm.

Pyle, Jean L. 1998, “Women and Home Work” in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender,
            Janet S, Chafetz, ed. Plenum Publishing, pp, 81-104

Pyle, Jean L. 2000, Sex, Maids, and Export Processing : Risks and Reasons for Gendered
Global Production Networks, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society,Vol.15, No. 1, Risks and Rights in the 21st Century : Papers from the Women and Gender in Global Perspectives Program Symposium, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Wijers, Marjan and Lap-Chew, Lin, 1997, Trafficking in Women: Forced Labour and
Slavery –like Practices in marriage, Domestic Labour and Prostitution.



[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape#Definitions

[2] Klaus A. Miczek, Joseph F. DeBold, Margaret Haney, Jennifer Tidey, Jeffrey Vivian, Elise M. Weerts, Alcohol, Drugs of Abuse, Aggression and Violence, Department of Psychology, Tufts University
[3] Dean G. Kilpatrick, Ph.D.,Heidi S. Resnick, Ph.D., Kenneth J. Ruggiero, Ph.D., Lauren M. Conoscenti, M. A., Jenna McCauley, M. S., Drug-facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape: A National Study, February 1, 2007, NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS RESEARCH & TREATMENT CENTER
  
[4] http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/

[9] http://www.498a.org/498aexplained.htm

[10] Gender Analysis of Indian Penal Code by Ved Kumari. P. 139-160. In Engendering Law: Essays in Honour of Lotika Sakar edited by Amita Dhanda and Archana Parashar. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company, 34, Lalbagh, Lucknow- 1. 1999.
[11] Ibid
[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labour_in_India
[14] Routasalo P, Isola A., The Right to touch and to be touched, Nurs Ethics. 1996 Jun;3(2):165-76., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8717880