Towards Structural Governance - Concerns and Understanding

Section II


CONCERNS AND UNDERSTANDING

After having evaluation on the Universal Crisis, expressed through Millennium Development Goal by United Nations, a body of Comity of Nations, it is important to have further intervention on various concerns of Political system, which is broader than the Millennium Development Goal and ultimately responsible for them.

Since most of the concerns were indicated while discussing the political understanding of the Millennium Development Goal, but it is more important to handle each issue separately to have a microscopic understanding.

Towards the understanding of intricacies on the development issue, it is more important to evaluate what are those concerns that block the Human Development. To evaluate such concern the whole study is divided into two sections, i.e.

1. Structural Concerns

2. Political Understanding

In the Structural Concerns all the issues such as corruption, security crisis (internal and cross border), health concerns, uneducated and unqualified population, malnutrition, neglected community, crimes, food insecurity, cultural war, identity crisis, shattered society and population explosion needs to be evaluated in the Structural form, i.e. Political, Social, Administrative and Scholarship will have a broader understanding the cause that is responsible for such crisis.

In the second section, the political understanding of the various political terms such as Democracy, Citizenship, Political Representation, the Theory of Tax/Tribute, Migration, Multi-cultural Society, Political Feudalism, Sovereignty, the Ideological War, etc. that will further focus on the solution of Political blockage towards World Governance.

The importance of division of Concerns and Understanding is mainly to create a structure of concerns and Understanding them beyond the ideological factor of World System that is floating in present governance.

According to Macro-Micro Theory of the State-system, Human Society is an extension of Human Body. Human Body is a complex machine and it has many aspects towards it sustainability. Besides physiological aspects, it has a division of Virtues and a system of Governance.

In the Micro Theory, the physical aspects are the organs of the body, which are closely knitted towards proper functioning of human body. The proper functioning of human body there is a need of immunity and resistance to check the illness and this is achieved through precaution and prevention that may disrupt the functioning of body. Health care becomes an absolute necessary to healthy survival.

The Second aspect of Human Body is Virtue, i.e. skill / abilities. There are four virtues in Human body, i.e. base (Shudra), economy (Vaishya), administration (Kshatriya) and Scholars (Brahmin). The shudra virtue in an Individual makes physical activities / labour. The making of physical labour towards economy generation is a virtue of Vaishya. The management, protection and implementation of wealth through economy generation are the virtue of kshatriya and lastly, to the appropriate and judiciously utility of all three virtues are the role of Brahmim.

Concept and Design (Brahmin)
↑ ↓
Implementation and Administration (kshatriya)
↑ ↓
Generation of Economy through Capital and Market (Vaishya)
↑ ↓
Execution (shudra)

The third aspect of Human Body is Governance system. There are three forms of governance in human body, i.e. Emotions, Reason and Faith. These governance systems have its own characteristics and distinct from each other and it has positive and negative effect due to its alienation from each other. Emotions make the human thinking generous so the Reason making them wise and Faith leads them to divinity.

All these aspects of Human body makes complete in self, i.e. Body, Abilities and Governance that makes an evolution in the Human System. The survival of body needs virtues and the virtues need governance towards the appropriate use. So, all these three aspects are interlinked and interconnected. The Body is the base of the Structure, Virtues are the pillars and Governance is the Roof of the structure.

Every Individual holds all the three aspects of the Human system, but what makes them distinct from each other that create variation is the level of vulnerability of these aspects. The virtues differ from individual to individual and the excellence of these virtues creates ‘Skill’ or ‘Expertise’, for example some may be excellent in physical labour, but will not be able to administer it resources, some may be excellent in resources generation, but will not be equipped towards physical labour. Similarly some may be excellent in visualizing, but will not be effective implementer. So, the variability creates a heterogeneous society and the variation is expertise makes the society interdependent.

The final aspect of Micro Theory of State-system is distinct division of virtue of Human Society is Gender, i.e. man and woman. Man is provider and protector and woman is the nurturer due to their physiological constitution. The formation of Society that led to Civilisation was basically on division of Virtues. From Hunter and Gatherer to the Settled Society was based on the instinct of interdependency.

In the Macro Theory, the above system holds broader prospects to understand the Governance system. Macro system is a State-system and family is the a single unit of the State-system, since family is the Micro governance of the State-system, i.e. Man-Woman collectively nurture the next generation as parents.

The Physical aspect of the Macro theory is Land / Regime / Polity. Land indicate physical landscape, Regime indicates Resources and Polity indicate People. The sovereign land includes all of them, i.e. physical land, resources and people.

The second as aspect of Virtue in the Macro theory is division of skills. The base, economy, administration and scholar make the society structured. Base are those who provide services, Economy those who generate resources and Administration that provide the security and environment towards services and economy generation and lastly the Scholars provide direction and justification to all the system so that they do not invade and exploit others’ domain.

The third aspect of the Macro Theory is Governance in the State-system. The way Individuals are governed by Emotions, Reason and Faith, similarly in the State-system governance is based on Power, Law and Religion (Culture). Power is governance defacto, Law makes governance dejure and Faith makes governance confined.

The Final aspect of the Macro Theory in the State-System is the relationship between State and Society. State (Man) is the Governance system (either dejure or defacto) which is responsible provision and protection and Society (Woman) is responsible for the social upbringing through family system and cultural norms.

The formation of civility from nomad is a long process of Evolution. From Hunting and gathering towards the process of settlement had a two distinct inclination, one who wanted to have a family system and those who preferred to remain the nomadic tribes. The vegetation through agriculture produce created a civilisation based on dependency. This created a division in based on virtues and skills and formation of a society. This is a naturally grown civilisation.

The distinction between nomads and civilized created a two forms of society. Nomads did not recognize the norm and remained explorers, wanderers and invaders. Whereas, the civility was acquired through norms, initially through Cultural norms that gradually became the customs and traditions.

In the era of Pre-statehood, the divisive of society of Nomad (defacto) and Cultured (through Customs and tradition) were distinct. Nomads became explorer and became an important tenet towards up-gradation of civilisation through technology advancement. The ‘collective efforts’ of the society towards its evolution through intact cultural norms have paved the way of Communism. Communism is the first step towards formation of Society. Communism means “Collective Effort” through Cultural Norms. Hence Communism is always homogeneous in nature since its governance system is Cultural Norms through customs and traditions. This paved the way towards Dejure Governance.

The nomads who were mainly explorer / invaders and wanders were Liberals who did not relate with any norms and hence became a big challenge to the Main-stream society. That was an initial state when Liberal always had a conflict with Communist, i.e. defacto vs. dejure. Hence, the ideological war the World is facing today has been persisting since the formation of civilisation and will remain. The abolishing of Communism, which is apprehended will not be possible due to its civility. The Marxist theory of Communism is a narrow understanding, which only limits to Class of the society, i.e. have and haves not, which is based on Forced Revolution and through Dictatorship of Proletariat. Islamic Communism is a cultural war, i.e. Jihad and through Conversion against Pagan System. But the Communism, i.e. Civilisation is actually a society of Norms and its approach is Collective Efforts through Structural Governance. Islamic Communism and Marxist Communism is regional pattern of Communism which has the influence of the region. The Islamic Communism was mainly due to tribal war based on belief system, whereas Marxist communism is a creation of Industrial Revolution. So, neither the Islamic Communism nor Marxist Communism could make the proper understanding of the Theory of Communism.

Gradually with the expansion of society and a constant threat from the Nomads towards invasion to the main-stream society compelled them to have a Statehood that would guarantee the Security from the invasions. The formation of Statehood recognized through Tribute system or Tax system. The legibility of the Statehood is determined by Tax / Tribute while tax / tribute authenticate Statehood. No State exists without Tax or no Tax is collected without Statehood. The importance of Tax is not just the collection towards state-expenses, but recognition towards a State system. The submission of the individual sovereignty to the State makes a sovereign state.

The theory of Tax and the theory State Sovereignty are interlinked. When the polity submits their individual sovereignty, i.e. submission of weapon to the State and makes the State responsible for security from Cross border invasion/insurgency and internal violence makes a sovereign State. The State then holds the defense mechanism, i.e. Army for cross-border and Police for internal security. Hence, the submission of individual sovereign through submission of weapon submits their Right to Kill and attain the Right to Security from the State-system.

The conversion from Right to Kill to Right to Security made a great change in the Civilisation. The dynamism of population was outlined by the border of sovereignty to the region hence Right to Security was the First stage of Statehood.

The second stage of Statehood was the Arbitration mechanism. With the growing population and submission of Individual sovereignty to statehood changed the governance system which was mainly done through customs and traditions at micro level. The disputes and exploitation could not be evaded due to growing civilisation. The nomadic tendencies were the constant threat even in the main-stream society. The need for arbitration mechanism and the justice system became mandatory. This expanded the state-system from Security to Judiciary. The need for Judiciary was mandatory towards redressed of disputes and grievances that justified the Right to Security through submission of Individual security. The enhancement of Tax collection also broadened towards more occupational liability of the State-system. By this stage there was already of formation of three structures, i.e. Base, i.e. the dynamism of population, Administration towards Security and Scholars for arbitration mechanism.

The relevance of Economy also expanded with the surplus produce. The surplus produce created Trade. Traders were mainly a community of nomad that was actually explorer of new dynamism. This created a tendency of Enterprising and explorer, which led to entrepreneur skill. Hence, Traders were always separated from the main-stream society and never believed to follow the norms of the society. This made them alienated and distinct from other structure. This made them closed community. The nomadic tendencies of Traders only followed their own trade and subsequently advocated for liberal outlook and a constant threat to the main-stream society. The trader skill was based on the manipulation and the maximum profit. The manipulation was either through constructive manner or destructive manner influences the World System.

Prior to Industrial Revolution, there was no terminology of World Economy. There was political system was based on Expansionist policies and a system of Tribute / Tax towards Political Control. The trading was mainly alienated from the Political Control, but there was ample support in tune of security to wealth and insurance from the pirates and calamities to which a big amount as tax / tribute was paid towards its facilitation.

The trade pattern has influenced all the World Politics from the rise of Islam to the era of Terrorism and from surplus produce to market control and from Statehood to Globalization, all are determined through Trade system and not the pattern of Economy. The evolution of Trade can be evaluated through the perspective of Pre-Industrial era, Industrial Era, Post WWII and Post Liberalization and Globalization.

The birth of Islam and the regime of Muslim is due to trade crisis is the region. The control of Trade route and unreasonable tributes in the name of God by the powerful tribes created a great mess in the Arab Tribal. Arab Tribes were nomad community and trade was the only source of economy of the region. The formation of Islamic community and Jihad against oppression was one form of Communism that took birth in Arab peninsular. The new state-system in Arab that was based on belief system and its constitution is their holy book Quran. Islamic State-system has no boundaries, but has a provision of expansion of regime through conversion. So, conversion became most crucial aspect of Islamic State-system. So, in the medieval era, the expansionist policies through invasion of the Islamic ruler were mainly to create an Islamic State system and conversion through force and Jajiya was the tool of Islamic governance system.

Islam became a society of protectionist since its virtue is Jihad against oppression. So, those who became converts were mainly the oppressed community of the era and /or who could not confront the force and aggression of Islamic governance through Jajiya system and hence submitted their original belief system. So, Islamic society has three virtues, i.e. Traders (Economy), Jihadis (military) and Oppressed community (base). The absence of Scholarship (Brahmin) was mainly due to the total submission to Islam and the unquestionable, un-audited and up-gradation of their doctrine of Quran made them stagnated even though they have the ample resources Natural and Human, but they are not able to utilize them towards Human Development. This is the reason, why the Community of Muslims is the most back-ward in comparison to of the rest of the World. Any Community that controls, captivate, subjugate and under-estimated the Scholarship, it is bound to decline and fall.

The Era of Industrial process was born through the blocking of trade route of European traders through Arab aggression. The fall of Trade in the West has compelled them to find the ways and means towards their sustainability. The Feudal Culture of the Europe had divided this era as Feudal Lords and the Serf. Serf were mainly those who were war slaves or bonded labour. This made them a community of Slaves. The virtues of the Europe were mainly technocrats, traders and strategists and they excelled through innovation of mode of production. The scholarships though excelled in Europe, but became the victims in the hand of Strategists either they were made exiled, imprisoned or killed. So, the European control always remained in the hand of strategists and all the development and skill were made according to the will of the feudal strategists to fulfill the aspiration of technical innovation and trading exploration.

Industrial revolution in Europe totally changed the Economy prospect. From agricultural indigenous economy to a mass production through technology has given a new shape to be Institutionalize system of livelihood. The technical innovation has created a new social fabric that replaced the traditional system of Slavery in Europe which was based on exploitation, subjugation and deprivation. The abolition of Slavery was due to the replacement of labor by technologies. Though the technology replaced the labor but could not extinct the instinct of Slavery system in the European culture.

The concept of Liberation comes when there is a virtue of captivation whereas Slavery is the virtue of captivation. That is the reason the concepts of liberty, liberalism and liberalization have come from the Western Scholarship than rest of the World. Europe has the legacy of three forms of slavery, i.e. Social Slavery, Slavery through Economy and Scholarship slavery and this slavery system is created, maintained and sustained by Feudal Strategists. Social Slavery indicated that women had no participation in the governance process and they were treated as par with slaves, criminals and migrants who had no property and hence they were not given a status of citizenship. The communism of serfs indicated economical slavery that were mainly landless and no participation in the governance system. The slavery of scholarship was controlled through monotheism that was further controlled by Church. The values of life and morality of humanity were controlled through the Institution of Church that was further facilitated by Strategists and that is why Christianity is the only Religion which has faced revolt since Christianity attained the feudalistic character in the belief system.

Monotheism is another form Communism that expanded its through Missionaries, which is feudal in character in Europe. The difference of approach of Missionaries and Jihad are distinct from each other. Missionaries focus structural support, i.e. human development concerns, whereas, Jihad provides physical protection against war, physical violence and social security. The two important factor of Human survival has significant support to the process of regime expansion.

The Religion is always born out of the need of the environment, so the fabric of monotheism is also the reflection of such need of situation of that Era. Religion is a fabric that binds a community that shares the same cultural values. Assimilation to that fabric binds the community together and intact. The collective efforts of the Religious Value and its expansion make it Communism.

The purpose of Religion is to govern the instinct towards moral enhancement towards universal survival. Islam was born to curtail the nomad tendencies and killing and brutal instinct of the Arab societies and Missionaries were born to curtail the instinct of Slavery towards human development. Both these fabric has its unique contribution towards the human society, i.e. provision and protection from the slavery and nomadic tendencies of human instinct. Hence, Religion became the first form of Governance which was separate from the Pagan system of Preservation of the Environment.

The most important aspect of these two moral governance systems is ‘resources’ that facilitate the strengthening of these fabrics. The Jihad system needs human resources who can submit their life towards the protection of their ideology, i.e. Protection of their community, whereas, Missionaries needed ample of resources to facilitate towards Human Development.

Though these two fabrics has nothing to contradict or conflict with each other, rather they are complementary to the human society, but what made them turn their opponent is the instincts, their process of expansion, i.e. Conversion and need for resources to sustain their respective fabric. The propagation, propaganda and the strategies to strengthen and expansion of their fabric by destructing Pagan system created ‘Identity crisis’ that led Cultural conflict, which is the most potent concern in the present political scenario.

The decline of Religion in the medieval phase also known as Dark Age is due to captivation of resources through invasion, intrusion, loot and strategies by promoting blindness through false belief and blocking Reason. Islamic invasion though could expand its fabric though jajiya, but could not provide human development, whereas, to sustain the Missionaries the need of resources made Church exploit their existing followers. Exploitation has limited life and led to Protest against Church, along with the fall of Islamic rule in the post medieval era. The decline of Religion, i.e. Moral governance leads to Power and Power captivate morality of the society that leads to negative instinct of corruption, exploitation and subjugation.

So, the Rise of Power has replaced the governance of Morality and Morality remained only a face value and a tool in the hands of Power. Now the question is how the Power generated and what are the tenets of Power and how the character of Power changed from Pre-industrial era, Industrial era, World War II and Globalization.

Pre-industrial era Power was generated through militancy and that is why Islamic era expanded in major part of the World. The nomadic tendencies in the Arab had made them invader, intruders and looter. Dynasties that ruled nations in the world were mainly based on Protection from the invaders and did not invade the indigenous governance system through social structure. The governance and the political alliance were mainly based on tax and tributes towards security internal and cross-border.

The change in War tools and patterns due to intrusion of Gun power in Military in Europe changed the complete scenario of Power concept. The manufacture of War Weapon towards distant battle had brought of replacement of new Power Concept from Europe that replaced Islamic era. Islamic concept of power was different from European concept of Power. Islamic concept of Power is mainly either through Invasion or Expansion to facilitate loot or establishing the Islamic rule. But the European concept of Power was to control the resources and enhancing European economy. The intrusion of Islamic invasion was direct and physical violence, whereas European invasion was through trade and strategies. The two distinct approach of Invasion was due to two distinct instinct, i.e. nomadic tendencies of Islamic aggressors and Feudalistic instinct of the Missionaries.

Without elaborating on history of the Colonial expansion towards resources and market, the technology of War weapon used to control the market. The approaches used by the strategists of Europe were different from the Islamic ruler. The Islamic ruler invaded, killed, looted and converted the people either through jajiya or destroying places of worship. Their pattern was similar in Arab where pagan system was destroyed and the same approaches were used in other part of the world. Whereas, European strategist approach was different from Islamic rural and was based on structural control. The invasions of European strategists to the targeted colonies were through economy, military, scholarship and missionary. Economy was the major factor of the strategists to which they had all-side coverage either through military or scholarship and missionary to support structural corrections.

The most important factor of their strategies where ‘Defense’ or ‘military’ control. The advancement of the Weapon tools of the European strategists created a new system of tribute / tax and expansion of the control by creating colonies. It is very crucial to understand how the handful ‘traders’ managed to control the world and make them colonies without bleeding as much as the Islamic rulers. This can be evaluated under the political understanding of “Sovereignty”.

Sovereignty means when a nation is self-equipped for your physical protection, i.e. Self-Defense. The second aspect of the sovereignty means when a nation is able to generate its survival means, i.e. food, shelter and health, this is called as Structural sovereignty. The third aspect of the sovereignty is when a nation is able to evaluate the system of survival sources through education and moral governance, this is termed as cultural sovereignty and the last factor of the sovereignty is the foreign relations, i.e. relationship with neighbouring states, regions or the world, when a nation is equipped decide its relationship with others, this is termed as Social sovereignty. And if the nation is able to maintain all these factors, then the nation has attained its freedom and is termed as Self-determined nation.

European Imperialism which had the hegemony of British and France was different from other European traders. The most distinct approach of British imperialism made them pioneer in the World Control system. Britishers understanding of governance system was based on varna system, i.e. structural. They controlled the colonies through Military, i.e. submission of defense, smashing scholarship, facilitation to traders by exploiting the base, i.e. farmers and tribal communities.

The generation of resources was primarily for the imperialistic power was through controlling the defense of the sovereign provinces to which a certain amount of tribute were charged. Gradually, the economy was controlled through captivation of the farming land and forest resources. Traders were facilitated who became the middle man or the liaison with the imperialistic power and the local ruler. Scholars or the respective culture were easily manipulated and facilitated so that they became the part of the strategy of the imperialistic power. The capture of resources by making the rulers and governance heads impotent, it became easy for Imperialistic power to establish their Empire in the region.

The Legacy of the British imperialism is a creation of a segment of the Liaison, i.e. middleman. The new built occupation created a vacuum between structures and established their own space of survival. The strengthening of this guild became so powerful that it weakened all the structure. The accountability of this guild was to none since their survival was based on manipulation and misappropriation. This manipulation and misappropriation pave the way to “Corruption”. The intrusion of parasite of corruption attacked the system of governance that became responsible for dismantling of the indigenous governance. Creating space within the structure was more crucial than create gap between cultural differences. The guild of liaison and middlemen were very significant for the imperialistic strategist, which turned as Political representation in the democratic system.

In Indian context, on pre-colonial era, after the fall of Mughal empire governance was decentralized and attained a province governance system. A decentralized system except of the threat of invasion and disputes the other structures were operative. The fall or the rise of empire was based on the competence of the province governance. The imperialistic strategist used this province system to attain the empire through divide and rule. The armed conflicts made the weak ruler to submit their defense to the Imperialistic technology and submitted their ‘sovereignty’ to the Colonial Masters. The submission of sovereignty started with submission of defense and foreign policies and subsequently submission of Economy.

The system of Tribute and Taxes were segmented. Tribute indicates as protection money and Tax is legal contribution towards statehood from its citizen that guarantees provision and protection to its people. Tribute is defacto and Tax is dejure collection for governance treasure. The imperialistic power worked both ways, i.e. on tribute as well as tax system. The protection to the province towards the military aggression of the neighbouring states were given a tribute to the Imperialistic government, whereas, the states which had Imperialistic control would pay as tax to the Government. The system of tribute and taxes is stilled continued between Mafia and States. Mafia takes protection money as Tribute, and State collect Tax from its citizen towards welfare measure. Tribute is unorganized collection without accountability, whereas Tax is an organized collection that is meant for the welfare measures for the People.

Taxes and Tributes play a crucial role in governance system. Two terms though synonyms to each other, but divide the human society drastically. As mentioned earlier, the human society is governed by three streams Law, Power and Faith. The collection of Tax authenticates the Institutional governance system based on Law. The commands of Tribute authenticate the system of Power, which is clustered in nature, i.e. Lobby system. The Donations authenticate the governance by Religion through its Trust system. The three systems of Governance, i.e. Institution, Lobby and Trust have their own role towards the well-being of the society and are complimentary to each other.

The human society is governed by Reason, Emotions and Faith finds their own system of governance. Those people who are governed by Reason become a part of the governance system based on Law. Those who are emotional and weak in reasoning are become a system of Lobby since they need to be in the cluster. Those people who neither feel themselves to be reason oriented and nor comfortable with the emotional captivation take the shelter of Faith, i.e. Religion. And all system has the provision of Tax / Tribute and Donation that makes them a sovereign system of their own.

According to the Macro-Micro Theory, Human governance system is based on reason, emotions and faith. Reason binds the two systems of emotions and faith. Reason paves the way towards progress. Emotion makes the survival sensitive. Emotions are shattered and reach to micro aspect of human sensitivity. Faith creates morality and makes the actions to accountability. The negative aspect of these governance tools are absolute Reason makes system rigid and raw, absolute emotions make system corrupt and biased and absolute faith make system narrow and blind.

In the appropriate governance system of human society, when “Reason governs Emotion bring Wisdom, and when Emotions support Reason brings Generosity”. This significance of Faith makes the enhancement of the “Morality” through norms and rituals that checks the nomadic tendencies that may destroy the peace of the society. All three systems are interconnected and not alienated to each other.

The society, which is governed by Norms, is known as main-stream society and the society that alienated from the universal norms become para-community. The two sections of the society are opponents to each other. Though the main-stream society has a restricted system due to its governance tool, but it has accountability and Universal survival to its community member. Whereas, in the para-community society due to absence of norms their survival is based on Power, i.e. Might is right basis. In this system subjugation, exploitation and threat is a constant flair of survival and the control system of this regime is physical violence and killing.

The tenure of Colonial era and Pre-World War II era the local indigenous governance system was attacked which was naturally grown though norms of the society. Prior to this era, para-community had a limited regime and alienated from the main-stream society. This division was distinct to check the nomadic tendencies of the main-stream society. The alienation from the main-stream society still bonded them into the norm which gave them recognition in the society. For example, Prostitution checks the nomadic tendencies and setting up the brothel system was to keep the main-stream society clean. Brothel system was also governed by its norms and made sure that their contribution to the human society gets recognized. The system of using the clay from the house of prostitute to create the idol of goddess Durga in the pagan belief system is to recognize the contribution of para-community to the main-stream society. This may not give social respect to the Prostitutes, but it gives them social recognition and it is made sure that their Human Rights are maintained and sustained.

The Celibacy approaches towards the Religious heads were not to get away from the sexual life. No religion debar from sexual life since sex is the food of the soul that keeps energizing the action. The restriction for marriage for the Religious heads was mainly to keep away from the trap of hereditary process towards the succession of the position. Devdasi system is to recognize and authenticate the sexual life to the Religious head. Devdasi representing the para-community and submission to the Priest was recognition to the community by the Religious governance system. This indicates that the para-community was also bonded with norms which had the protection from the Religious system. During this era, i.e. pre-colonization, Religion was binding both the stream of the society, i.e. Main-stream and Para-Community through its norms and rituals. This has made society, i.e. Pre-colonial era a Dejure regime.

Dejure governance is an evolution process along with the growth of population and its diversity due to technological advancement. The Industrial revolution brought a drastic change in the character of the governance system due to change of economy. The concept of mass production form the self-sufficiency economy brought a change over in the approach of Trade that was the main resources of Indigenous economy.

Any land the economy is assessed by its production capacity that makes surplus produce to generate resources. This is what happened with the Industrial Revolution. Mass production brought ample surplus that made the European traders to explore the market can create a strong business fabric. Trade created lots of capital and surplus money which was further went on circulation towards the enhancement of economy.

The process of Colonization spread due to market system. Market means raw material, human resources and the consumer for the end product. This is called Economic Invasion. Prior to Industrialization, the invasion was based on Political interest, but this has reversed the system by economic invasion. This invasion made the regime that was governed by norms and self-sufficient economy was curtailed by Mass production. To impose the produce and to create the market, political tools were used by destroying the socio-cultural norms. This made the indigenous governance shattered.

The Colonial era thus becomes a defacto governance system by destroying the cultural norms and intellectual colonization towards the vested interest of the Economic invaders. The World Wars amongst the imperialistic power was also a consequence of the defacto governance, which was mainly a War of Economy.

The institutionalized system evolved in Europe after Industrialization through enhancement of technology and subsequent Wars I and II had made a drastic change in the sociology of European demography. Institutional governance system and its facilitation to the polity came through urbanization. Industries to support education, i.e. vocational skill made Economy man oriented and women to remain alienated. This brought a drastic change in the status of women in Imperialistic nations.

The Liberation for Women was mainly to bring into the main-stream society which was denied due to Industrialization. The contribution to the workforce by women in the agrarian society were at par with men, but due to the change in the means of survival which became technical and skill oriented than mere labour in the earlier society. The tenure between the Industrial process and the World Wars were almost of three great centuries which was a significant space to deteriorate the condition of women. After the fall of huge male population, due to the Wars in the region, it became mandatory for women to come ahead to participate in the production process for resource generation.

The Liberal concept of the Western World is a mere confusion in the field of Political Science. Western understanding of Liberalism has three aspects, i.e. Political, Economical and Social. The Political view indicates the Limited State to which State has negligible intervention or involvement in the indigenous system. Liberal Economy meant that the process or generation should be owned by Individual and Not State. Liberal society means no social control and every individual should be responsible for themselves. But the ideology of Liberalism was not competent of its own since no society can survive of its own and it needs support system so the governance by Laws through Constitutional Bodies and Institutions were established. Economy was governed through Guilds and Social system was controlled through Welfare Institutions, like Health Care, Old age, Educational Institutes, etc. The Institutionalized of the Governance system is Plato’s vision of ‘Communism’. Erosion of the family system, which was the micro governance and micro asset, i.e. next generation to be adopted by the State and men, women and children, would have been the State assets and responsibility towards nurturing. The conversion of the attribute of Women, i.e. nurturing the family was institutionalized through Education, Healthcare and Environment. The institution of Non-Government Organizations is performing the communism of the family system. Further the erosion of custom and tradition though the Renaissance era has further helped the erosion of the social system. The Western advocacy for Liberalism is far away from its implementation and the ideological Wars between Liberal and Communism is a blur towards understanding.

The Liberal inclination is the tenet of Nomadic approach that do not relate to the Norms and Civility. Capitalism is treated as synonyms of Liberalism, which is an incorrect since Liberalism is an approach whereas Capitalism is only a process of Economy generation. Capitalism can be Liberal orientation as well have a Communism inclination.

Liberalism neither believes in family system or the State system. It has the Individual flair of system, which is away from the structure of family and the Institutions of State-system. Liberalism approach is freedom from all systems and merely works on individual entrepreneurships. Liberty from Political Control, Liberty towards Economic process and Liberty from the Social accountability is the only motivating factor of Liberal understanding. The civilisation is an evolution from nomads which was bonded with norms, but when the norms are eroded then again the civility converts of nomadic.

The evolution of Liberalism in Europe was mainly an outcome from the erosion of the family system. The nurturing process of the society was institutionalizing which could not sustain due to its cost effective and inappropriate utilization of Human Resources due to Regional wars and competence. The evolution of Liberal era led to an era of violence, exploitation and subjugation. The process of Colonization that led to two World Wars is an outcome of Liberal era.

The community of Liberal society dominated the World with its Scholarship through Intellectual Colonization. To streamline the segmented societies to a political setup as democratic or dictatorship to cover-up their hidden character of liberal instinct of slavery and violence.

Democracy and Dictatorship (individual or one party system) pattern of Political system was not complete in itself. The Democratic system works on electoral representation of Province system. It functions on the ratio of 51:49, i.e. the representation becomes authentic by 51% of population against the rejection of 49% population. It indicates the accountability to 51% of population by neglecting 49% of population.

Another major factor of Democracy, it is a constant conflict between whether it has People’s sovereignty or the sovereignty of Law. This brings a conflict between the institution of Parliament and the institution of Law, i.e. Judiciary. Parliament works under the equation of 51:49, whereas Judiciary works within the framework of Constitution that guarantees Universal Survival. Parliament functions through mass mobilization, whereas Judiciary functions within rules and regulation.

The third aspect of Democracy is the Party system. Party system creates a division of ideology which again functions on the equation of 51:49. This further divides the province on ideology basis that again negligence to 49% of population.

Democracy has always been associated with Liberty, i.e. liberty to choose it’s representative, liberty to express the views and liberty to protest. This process is always played within the equation of 51:49.

Another aspect of Democracy that is always associated with Capitalism, whereas Capitalism is different from Democracy. Capitalism is a process of resources regeneration which can either be in a democratic set up or in the dictatorship system. The characteristic of the Province representation is feudalistic in nature. The feudalism in democratic set up can be acquired through dynasty or through muscle and money. That is why province representation is feudal in nature and makes it defacto in governance system.

After World War II, and the subsequent numerous agitations from the Colonies made imperialistic power to withdraw their direct control on the colonies and created a system called Leased Governance which was based on annual tributes.

The approach by the Traders of the Imperialistic countries to capture the resources through Military operation is still being continued. Though officially the colonies have been removed and give a status of sovereign nation, but that colonies still remain under the Imperialistic power within the fabric of Commonwealth and Global Political Economy. So, Commonwealth Nations are a stream of World System that is controlled by British Imperialism.

Commonwealth nation is a concept to which on the face of World they have been given independences from the colonial clutches, but they are totally controlled by English governance mechanism. The concept of democracy is a system, where representation is democratically elected and people submit their political rights to their representative. The polity remains only at a receiving end since it submits is decision making process in the hand of their representatives. It is easy to manipulate the few hundred representatives and mobilizing the policies that favor the imperialistic interest.

Even though the World has attained the status of Sovereign Lands, but the World Control system is in the hands of World War winners. The Commonwealth Nations are controlled by the British imperialism through control of State treasure. The tribute is reached to the British masters by way of defacto collection of tax through scams and organized corruption. The control on policy and the foreign relations are the tool to control the governance. Every Commonwealth nation is the victim of rigorous insoluble border disputes and chronic indigenous security crisis through Tribal conflicts. These are issues of the security measures attained to control the Nations incase they decide to come out from the grip of the Strategic feudal. The control on Commonwealth nation is based on Leased Governance system, i.e. a system that will follow the policies and the strategies have placed by the Colonial master under the local ruler. Though these rulers may be elected through democratic norms, but the governance tools and the policies cannot be changed with the wish and means of the rulers. Anything that will go against the wishes of Imperialistic interest, the local will be bashed by indigenous crisis or cross border war or through terrorism. So, the present World system based on the Democratic norms is a Leased Governance system and submission to British Imperialism. Those were not into the Imperialistic grip are targeted through NATO in the name of dictatorship and human rights. The Political control towards the control of resources is the main aim of the Leased Governance system. Corruption has risen in the world is nothing but the Tribute to the Defacto control of the Imperialistic masters. Another operational mode to control the local agents of the Imperial masters is that they allow agents to invest all their accumulated wealth in their home country through buying properties and in the lockers by way of gold and currency. In case these agents became traitor to their Masters, they seize their property and get their Agent killed.

Terrorism is a tool to control the polity without waging the war by the Imperialistic Masters. This is an arrangement of defacto army, which is generally organized by local adjutant tribal in the Arab peninsula. All the terrorists’ camps are furnished by the western imperialism to control the region towards resources. The slogan of “War against Terrorism” is mainly to be collective efforts in buying defense mechanism sold by the Guild of Arms and Weapon manufacturers. The marketing strategy of these mechanisms is to instigate the disturbance with the high technical small arm weapon. This will put pressure on the State defense to buy the suitable tools to counter them. So, unless there is no security threat, there will have no chance of selling weapons. The two polar system or multi-polar system is nothing to pressurize the nations towards purchase of weapons. These strategies are facilitated by the Local government through various corruptions in the Institutions that make system weak.

Hence, while concluding with a brief note that the need of governance mechanism is the Political Science has been overlooked and the following on the ideology of economy pattern created a divisive system. The world divided into two understand, i.e. a Liberal approach and other Collective approach or whether the Institution should be followed democratically elected or dictatorship remained a narrow understanding of Political Science. But somehow these approaches have failed to provide solutions. The Institutions are only operational tools but not governance mechanism. The dejure system based on structures provides Universal survival. In the next section a detailed understanding of Structural governance which will authenticate true sense of democracy where people will be master of their own and they will form the policies towards their own prosperity.